Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz Criticizes Trump’s Prosecution as “Banana Republic Land” Amid Biden’s Frustration Over DOJ Investigation

On Friday, Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz expressed strong criticism of the prosecution of former President Donald Trump over his contesting of the 2020 election, stating that it “looks like banana republic land.” This comes in response to reports that President Joe Biden has grown frustrated with the slow progress of the Department of Justice’s investigation into Trump.

During his Thursday arraignment, Trump pleaded not guilty to all charges after Special Counsel Jack Smith obtained a four-count indictment related to Trump’s efforts to challenge the 2020 election results. Prior to this, Smith had secured a 37-count indictment against Trump in June, focusing on allegations surrounding classified documents.

According to The New York Times, Biden has privately expressed concern over the pace of the investigation into Trump and believes that the former president poses a threat to democracy, urging the Justice Department to pursue prosecution.

“President Biden urged his attorney general to indict the man who he knew was going to be the leading opponent if against him,” Dershowitz told David Asman, who guest-hosted “Kudlow” on Fox Business Network. “That begins to look like banana republic land. That’s what happens when people in power are afraid of the democratic process. What they do is they seek the indictment and prosecution of the people who are running against them.”

WATCH:

“I have a constitutional right to vote against Donald Trump for the third time,” Dershowitz said. “I voted against him twice, I intend to vote against him again, but I want to have that right to vote against him and not have that right taken away from me by prosecutors and by the president, who wants to see him imprisoned. That’s just not the American way.”

Dershowitz also noted the choice of the District of Columbia as the venue for the trial, prompting Asman to ask if the United States was becoming a “banana republic,” noting his coverage of Latin America and Eastern Europe.

“This is a step in that direction, and also placing the case in the District of Columbia, which is 95% anti-Trump, putting it in front of a judge with a history of anti-Trump. If the government thinks they have a strong case, they ought to join the defense and agree to move it to West Virginia or Virginia and put it in front of another judge who doesn’t have a long history of anti-Trump attitudes,” Dershowitz said. “So, I don’t believe he can get a fair trial in the District of Columbia.”

Legal experts noted that much of the conduct Smith claimed was criminal in the indictment appeared to be protected by the First Amendment. Harvard University law professor Alan Dershowitz said that the indictment not only attacked the First Amendment, but also Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel.

Trump’s top rivals for the Republican nomination for president in 2024, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, Republican Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina and businessman Vivek Ramaswamy, all condemned the indictment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *